<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ron&#039;s Musings &#187; Treason</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ronsmusings.com/tag/treason/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ronsmusings.com</link>
	<description>One man&#039;s reflections on walking with God</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:49:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Under the Bill</title>
		<link>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/06/26/under-the-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/06/26/under-the-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RINOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treason]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronsmusings.com/2007/06/26/under-the-bill/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I hear the phrase &#8220;under the bill&#8221; one more time regarding &#8220;comprehensive immigration reform&#8221; I think I will throw up. I was listening to Chertoff on Cavuto this afternoon and every time Cavuto brought up conservative objections, Chertoff&#8217;s response was &#8220;under the bill&#8230;&#8221; I&#8217;m convinced they are being intentionally obtuse. We&#8217;ve repeated over and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I hear the phrase &#8220;under the bill&#8221; one more time regarding &#8220;comprehensive immigration reform&#8221; I think I will throw up. I was listening to Chertoff on Cavuto this afternoon and every time Cavuto brought up conservative objections, Chertoff&#8217;s response was &#8220;under the bill&#8230;&#8221; I&#8217;m convinced they are being intentionally obtuse. We&#8217;ve repeated over and over that we don&#8217;t trust the government to do what the bill says.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been down this road before and all the evidence says the government isn&#8217;t serious about controlling the border or doing anything about illegals already here except to give them a pass. Of course, that just creates more incentive for more illegals to cross the boarder the government has shown no interest in securing. So why on earth should we trust them when they tell us that &#8220;under the bill&#8221; this and that will happen.</p>
<p>Chertoff, et. al. know this full well. Lindsey Graham knows this. All of them know this. We&#8217;ve said it ad nauseum! They simply choose to ignore what we say and go on calling us bigots and talking about what the bill will do. The fact is, current law calls for a fence that isn&#8217;t getting built. Current law calls for border enforcement. There is no need for another law to do these things. Yet Bush, Chertoff and the rest have no interest in enforcing current law. So WHY SHOULD WE TRUST THEM to enforce a new law? There is simply no reason to trust them.</p>
<p>A common definition for insanity is doing the same thing over and over, expecting a different result. The Bush administration and its lackeys in Congress apparently assume the electorate is insane. We should trust them to do the same thing they always done and expect them to actually enforce the law <em>this time</em>! I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>I like the idea I heard on the Laura Ingraham show today. Lets just start calling them former, as in former Senator Lindsey Graham and former Homeland Security Secretary Chertoff. I&#8217;ve already started working to unseat Lindsey Graham and there is a groundswell against him in South Carolina.</p>
<p>So if you are tempted to buy this line the &#8220;under the bill&#8221; they will secure the border and there will be a fence and there are triggers, don&#8217;t you believe it. They have to earn our trust. If your friend lies to you, you might give them another chance. But if they lie to you repeatedly, it takes a long, sustained effort of earning trust before you will be willing to trust them again. The same is true of our government. Let&#8217;s all assume the state motto of Oklahoma: Show Me! The only way they can show me is to start enforcing the law now and sustain that effort for an extended period of time. Then and only then, come back and maybe we&#8217;ll talk. But until they do that, there is absolutely no reason to trust them.</p>
<p class="zoundry_bw_tags">  <!-- Tag links generated by Zoundry Blog Writer. Do not manually edit. http://www.zoundry.com --></p>
<p>  <span class="ztags"></span><span class="ztagspace">Technorati</span> : <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/Amnesty" class="ztag">Amnesty</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/Border%20Security" class="ztag">Border Security</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/Illegal%20Aliens" class="ztag">Illegal Aliens</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/Immigration%20Reform" class="ztag">Immigration Reform</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/Lying%20Politicians" class="ztag">Lying Politicians</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/Politics" class="ztag">Politics</a><br />
<span class="ztags"></span><span class="ztagspace">Del.icio.us</span> : <a rel="tag" href="http://del.icio.us/tag/Amnesty" class="ztag">Amnesty</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://del.icio.us/tag/Border+Security" class="ztag">Border Security</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://del.icio.us/tag/Illegal+Aliens" class="ztag">Illegal Aliens</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://del.icio.us/tag/Immigration+Reform" class="ztag">Immigration Reform</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://del.icio.us/tag/Lying+Politicians" class="ztag">Lying Politicians</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://del.icio.us/tag/Politics" class="ztag">Politics</a><br />
<span class="ztags"></span><span class="ztagspace">Ice Rocket</span> : <a rel="tag" href="http://blogs.icerocket.com/tag/Amnesty" class="ztag">Amnesty</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://blogs.icerocket.com/tag/Border+Security" class="ztag">Border Security</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://blogs.icerocket.com/tag/Illegal+Aliens" class="ztag">Illegal Aliens</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://blogs.icerocket.com/tag/Immigration+Reform" class="ztag">Immigration Reform</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://blogs.icerocket.com/tag/Lying+Politicians" class="ztag">Lying Politicians</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://blogs.icerocket.com/tag/Politics" class="ztag">Politics</a><br />
<span class="ztags"></span><span class="ztagspace">Flickr</span> : <a rel="tag" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/Amnesty" class="ztag">Amnesty</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/Border+Security" class="ztag">Border Security</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/Illegal+Aliens" class="ztag">Illegal Aliens</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/Immigration+Reform" class="ztag">Immigration Reform</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/Lying+Politicians" class="ztag">Lying Politicians</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/Politics" class="ztag">Politics</a><br />
<span class="ztags"></span><span class="ztagspace">Zooomr</span> : <a rel="tag" href="http://beta.zooomr.com/photos/tags/Amnesty" class="ztag">Amnesty</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://beta.zooomr.com/photos/tags/Border%20Security" class="ztag">Border Security</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://beta.zooomr.com/photos/tags/Illegal%20Aliens" class="ztag">Illegal Aliens</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://beta.zooomr.com/photos/tags/Immigration%20Reform" class="ztag">Immigration Reform</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://beta.zooomr.com/photos/tags/Lying%20Politicians" class="ztag">Lying Politicians</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://beta.zooomr.com/photos/tags/Politics" class="ztag">Politics</a><br />
<span class="ztags"></span><span class="ztagspace">Buzznet</span> : <a rel="tag" href="http://www.buzznet.com/buzzwords/Amnesty" class="ztag">Amnesty</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.buzznet.com/buzzwords/Border%20Security" class="ztag">Border Security</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.buzznet.com/buzzwords/Illegal%20Aliens" class="ztag">Illegal Aliens</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.buzznet.com/buzzwords/Immigration%20Reform" class="ztag">Immigration Reform</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.buzznet.com/buzzwords/Lying%20Politicians" class="ztag">Lying Politicians</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.buzznet.com/buzzwords/Politics" class="ztag">Politics</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/06/26/under-the-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bipartisan BS</title>
		<link>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/05/22/bipartisan-bs/</link>
		<comments>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/05/22/bipartisan-bs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 20:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RINOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treason]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronsmusings.com/2007/05/22/bipartisan-bs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#8217;t begin to describe my emotions upon hearing the collective stream of BS coming from the Senate Floor. Senator after Senator took the floor to describe their wonderful immigrant ancestors. The message was clear. All of us who oppose the rising tide of illegal immigrants remaining here legally are actually opposed to ALL immigration. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t begin to describe my emotions upon hearing the collective stream of BS coming from the Senate Floor. Senator after Senator took the floor to describe their wonderful immigrant ancestors. The message was clear. All of us who oppose the rising tide of illegal immigrants remaining here legally are actually opposed to ALL immigration. We don&#8217;t understand what this country was built on. We are bigots and xenophobes.</p>
<p>Listening to Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter tell about his father and brother immigrating here was just wonderful. What an inspiring story. But what on Earth does it have to do with the situation at hand? Specter&#8217;s father and brother immigrated here legally. They came here, submitted to processing, filled out the paperwork and followed our immigration laws. They learned English and worked to assimilate into American society.</p>
<p>South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham did precisely the same thing last week. The video is below in this blog. He talked about a Hispanic guy in the Air Force that was an inspiration to him. Great! No problem! Does anyone believe that Hispanic man in the Air Force was an illegal alien? Did he sneak across our border and join the Air Force? Of course not. If he was an immigrant at all he was a legal immigrant.</p>
<p>This in contrast to the ever growing flood of illegal aliens crossing our borders. They are not interested in becoming Americans. They have no desire to learn English or assimilate into American society. Mostly they want to take advantage of the services offered here and send money back to their home countries. Did you know that one of the biggest aspects of the Mexican economy is money sent home from America? That&#8217;s certainly one reason the Mexican government has been so opposed to any effort on our part to do something about the border.</p>
<p>The Congress can&#8217;t seem to understand why the American public doesn&#8217;t trust them on this. Could it be that we have been here before? We were told we&#8217;d have border security with the immigration reform in the &#8217;80s. Did we get it? Does 12-20 million illegal aliens in this country look like we got it?</p>
<p>Now, rather than engage in an honest debate, they prefer to lie about those of us who oppose this measure. They say we are bigots and xenophobes. They do not acknowledge that there is a difference between illegal and legal immigration. In short, they lie to support their position and, apparently, they believe that if they lie long enough we will buy the lie. Small wonder we don&#8217;t trust Congress!</p>
<p>If you guys in the Congress want to gain some credibility, stop trying to shove this sham of a bill down our throats and instead, ENFORCE OUR CURRENT LAWS!! If you do that consistently for a period of time, you might just build up a little credibility. But so long as you insist on playing politics with the American people, so long as they continue to lie and mischaracterize those of us who oppose their position, they have no credibility.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t hold your breath waiting for them to change though. Graham, Specter, McCain and all the rest of the Republicans pushing so hard on this issue are not concerned with what we, the people they represent, think. They somehow think that doing this will enhance their future electability. As for Graham, I think he&#8217;s angling for the VP spot with McCain. The problem for Graham is, McCain doesn&#8217;t stand a chance of getting the nomination and Graham doesn&#8217;t stand a chance of keeping his Senate seat in &#8217;08. His political career as a Republican is all but over. He is already a lame duck and he is blind to the fact.</p>
<p>I can think of no better reason for resurrecting the issue of term limits. Career politicians are the biggest problem in this country. They are far less concerned with what is actually best for this country than they are about the next election. So long as power is the motivating factor, do not expect most of our elected officials to actually honor their promises and act in an ethical, principled manner.</p>
<p>I was on the phone with my father in Georgia last night. He&#8217;s been a big supporter of Georgia Senator Saxby Chambliss. But Chambliss is one of those Republicans working so hard to sell out this country. My dad can&#8217;t believe it! I don&#8217;t know what all the backroom deals have been. I know President Bush is looking for a legacy in a lame duck presidency and who can imagine what he has promised to Republicans who toe the line on this.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I do know. If Republicans allow this legislation to become law, the Republican party is finished for the foreseeable future. All of Harry Reid&#8217;s predictions of massive Democrat Gains in the Senate will come to pass. Nancy Pelosi will be Speaker of the House for the next ten years at least. Maybe a solid conservative like Fred Thompson will be able to pull out the White House, I don&#8217;t know. But I&#8217;d lay odds that we will again be saying President Clinton and that is a future I don&#8217;t relish.</p>
<p>Finally, if this legislation becomes law, the Democrat party will be the ultimate winner. The vast majority of the illegal aliens in this country are already indebted to Democrats for the services they currently receive. The Democrats will continue with their vote buying legislative agenda. It could be a generation or more before the Republican party can recover, if them. Why congressional Republicans can&#8217;t see that simple fact is quite beyond me.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=www.ronsmusings.com%2f2007%2f05%2f22%2fbipartisan-bs%2f&amp;title=Bipartisan+BS&amp;bodytext=I+can't+begin+to+describe+my+emotions+upon+hearing+the+collective+stream+of+BS+coming+from+the+Senate+Floor.++Senator+after+Senator+took+the+floor+to+describe+their+wonderful+immigrant+ancestors.++The+message+was+clear.++All+of+us+who+oppose+the+rising+tide+of+illegal+immigrants+remaining+here+legally+are+actually+opposed+to+ALL+immigration.++We+don't+understand+what+this+country+was+built+on.++We+are+bigots+and+xenophobes.&amp;topic=political_opinion"><img width="91" src="http://digg.com/img/badges/91x17-digg-button.gif" alt="Digg!" height="17" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/05/22/bipartisan-bs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amnesty by Any Other Name Still Screws America</title>
		<link>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/05/18/amnesty-by-any-other-name-screws-america/</link>
		<comments>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/05/18/amnesty-by-any-other-name-screws-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 15:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RINOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treason]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronsmusings.com/2007/05/18/amnesty-by-any-other-name-screws-america/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Bush, along with RINOs Lindsey Graham and John McCain and Democrat Ted Kennedy, have reached a &#8220;compromise&#8221; for comprehensive immigration reform. That phrase, &#8220;comprehensive immigration reform&#8221; is code for amnesty. President Bush announced that the plan does not grant amnesty but any bill that allows aliens currently in this country illegally to pay a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa180/goodwyne/facing_up_to_illegal_immigration.jpg" style="DISPLAY: inline; FLOAT: right; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; WIDTH: 512px; HEIGHT: 409px" height="409" width="512" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket" border="0"/></a></p>
<p>President Bush, along with RINOs Lindsey Graham and John McCain and Democrat Ted Kennedy, have reached a &#8220;compromise&#8221; for comprehensive immigration reform. That phrase, &#8220;comprehensive immigration reform&#8221; is code for amnesty. President Bush announced that the plan does not grant amnesty but any bill that allows aliens currently in this country illegally to pay a fine and get on a &#8220;path to citizenship&#8221; or permanent residency is an amnesty bill.</p>
<p>Virtually no one likes this bill. Backers are reluctant to discuss specifics beyond saying illegals will have to pay a fine and return home for a period of time. It is unlikely that the return home will be enforced or, if enforced, that illegals will have to stay for any significant period of time. How do you track more the more than 12 million people? Maybe set up another inefficient federal agency? And a $5,000 fine is a price many around the world would gladly pay for legal entrance into the united states. Yet those who have not entered this country illegally don&#8217;t get any special treatment and path toward citizenship.</p>
<p>Additionally, the Z visa only requires the head of household to return to the home country. His family can stay and there is no real idea of just how long he might have to stay in his home country but one official said it could be as short as one day. Convince me that won&#8217;t encourage more illegal immigration! Only a fool could believe that tail.</p>
<p>While this compromise seems historic, it appears there is still an uphill battle. Both conservatives and liberals have problems with it. Conservatives, of course, oppose the amnesty aspect of the proposal. Liberals oppose the change in immigration standards away from uniting families and toward more emphasis on skills.</p>
<p>Still, there is great interest on both sides of the aisle for passing some kind of comprehensive immigration reform this year. With that attitude, it is all but certain that, without outside effort, this will become a reality in some form before it&#8217;s all over. Conservatives must stay in touch with their Senators and Congressmen and keep the pressure on. This must be stopped. Amnesty did not work 20 some odd years ago and it won&#8217;t work today.</p>
<p>For my money, the way to deal with illegals currently in this country is to make it so painful for companies to employee them that simply won&#8217;t take the risk. When illegals find they cannot find work and support their families, much less send money back home, they will go home voluntarily. If there is not reason to be here, why would the stay? The incentives to come here illegally must be removed. That, along with real border enforcement will solve our problem. Then and only then we can look at a guest worker program and at that point, those who can speak English will have an advantage, regardless of whether they were previously here illegally</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Fred Thompson said that the bill and the attempt to create any comprehensive immigration reform should be scrapped until the border is secured. YEAH! That&#8217;s a position I can really get behind.</p>
<p><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=www.ronsmusings.com%2f2007%2f05%2f18%2famnesty-by-any-other-name-screws-america%2f&amp;title=Amnesty+by+Any+Other+Name+Still+Screws+America&amp;bodytext=President+Bush%2c+along+with+RINOs+Lindsey+Graham+and+John+McCain+and+Democrat+Ted+Kennedy%2c+have+reached+a+%22compromise%22+for+comprehensive+immigration+reform.++That+phrase%2c+%22comprehensive+immigration+reform%22+is+code+for+amnesty.++President+Bush+announced+that+the+plan+does+not+grant+amnesty+but+any+bill+that+allows+aliens+currently+in+this+country+illegally+to+pay+a+fine+and+get+on+a+%22path+to+citizenship%22++or+permanent+residency+is+an+amnesty+bill.&amp;topic=political_opinion" target="_blank"><img width="91" alt="Digg!" height="17" src="http://digg.com/img/badges/91x17-digg-button.gif"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/05/18/amnesty-by-any-other-name-screws-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reid Between the Lines</title>
		<link>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/04/21/reid-between-the-lines/</link>
		<comments>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/04/21/reid-between-the-lines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 18:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appeasement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treason]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronsmusings.com/2007/04/21/reid-between-the-lines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry but I stole that headline from Family Research Council. Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid, has said the decision by the Supreme Court to uphold the federal partial birth abortion ban should have included O&#8217;Connor instead of Alito. The clear implication is that it would have been decided the other way under such circumstances. But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry but I stole that headline from Family Research Council. Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid, has said the decision by the Supreme Court to uphold the federal partial birth abortion ban should have included O&#8217;Connor instead of Alito. The clear implication is that it would have been decided the other way under such circumstances. But Reid has repeatedly described himself as pro-life. Indeed, every time there has been an opportunity to vote on a partial birth abortion ban, Reid has voted in favor of. Reid, in fact, voted for the very law the Supreme Court ruled on in this case. So Reid apparently wants it both ways. He wants to go on record as support pro-life legislation but he doesn&#8217;t actually want such legislation to become law.</p>
<p>On another front, Reid again shot himself in the foot. This week at the National Press Club Reid said that the war in Iraq is lost.</p>
<p><a href="http://ronsmusings.com/2007/04/21/reid-between-the-lines/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>So Reid believes that the war is lost and the the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State know this to be true. At the same time, Reid does not support withdrawing funding for the war. This is the height of hypocrisy and Harry Reid is on the verge of committing treason. Democrats in general have constantly engaged in activity that encourages our enemies for the purpose of consolidating political power. Now Reid has given considerable aid and comfort to our enemies by declaring that we have lost this war.</p>
<p>Harry Reid is either a moron or he is so consumed with political power that he will do and say anything to gain it. Either way he has no business being in the Senate. His constituents should do whatever it takes to replace him. Tom Daschle discovered that there was a price to pay for demagoguery and it is high time his replacement made the same discovery.</p>
<p><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=www.ronsmusings.com%2f2007%2f04%2f21%2freid-between-the-lines%2f&amp;title=Reid+Between+the+Lines&amp;bodytext=Senate+Majority+Leader%2c+Harry+Reid%2c+has+said+the+decision+by+the+Supreme+Court+to+uphold+the+federal+partial+birth+abortion+ban+should+have+included+O'Connor+instead+of+Alito.++The+clear+implication+is+that+it+would+have+been+decided+the+other+way+under+such+circumstances.++But+Reid+has+repeatedly+described+himself+as+pro-life.+&amp;topic=political_opinion" target="_blank"><img width="91" alt="Digg!" height="17" src="http://digg.com/img/badges/91x17-digg-button.gif"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/04/21/reid-between-the-lines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ted Kennedy&#8217;s Private Foreign Policy</title>
		<link>http://ronsmusings.com/2006/11/12/ted-kennedys-private-foreign-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://ronsmusings.com/2006/11/12/ted-kennedys-private-foreign-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 01:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treason]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronsmusings.com/2006/11/12/ted-kennedys-private-foreign-policy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to CNSNews, during the 1980s, Ted Kennedy undertook his own private foreign policy with the Soviet Union. Beginning in 1980, while Carter was still President and Kennedy was seeking the Democrat nomination, Kennedy determined that &#8220;the Carter administration had assumed an overly belligerent posture toward the Soviet Union after the invasion of Afghanistan.&#8221; In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200611/POL20061102b.html" target="_blank">CNSNews</a>, during the 1980s, Ted Kennedy undertook his own private foreign policy with the Soviet Union. Beginning in 1980, while Carter was still President and Kennedy was seeking the Democrat nomination, Kennedy determined that &#8220;the Carter administration had assumed an overly belligerent posture toward the Soviet Union after the invasion of Afghanistan.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="margin-right: 0px"><p>In Kennedy&#8217;s view, &#8220;the atmosphere of tension and hostility towards the whole Soviet people was being fuelled by Carter&#8221; as well as by some key advisors, the Pentagon and the U.S. military industrial complex.</p>
<p>(&#8230;)</p>
<p>While Soviet troops occupied Afghanistan in 1980, Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) worked in close concert with high level Kremlin officials to alter the direction of U.S. policy, according to documents made available through a KGB defector.</p></blockquote>
<p dir="ltr">This information come to light through Soviet defector Vasiliy Mitrokhin who defected to Britain in 1992. &#8220;The Mitrokhin papers highlight a meeting that took place at the behest of Kennedy between former Sen. John Tunney (D-Calif.) and KGB agents in Moscow on March 5, 1980.&#8221;</p>
<p dir="ltr">Mitrokhin filed a report with the Cold War International History Project of the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington D.C. which revealed the details of Kennedy&#8217;s actions during the 1980s. Kennedy attempted to undermine the foreign policy of both the Carter and Reagan administrations.</p>
<p dir="ltr">According to Charles Dunn, dean of the Robertson School of Government at Regent University:</p>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="margin-right: 0px">
<p dir="ltr">The secret overtures to the KGB during the Reagan years were particularly insidious, Dunn said, because Tunney and Kennedy were working to undermine what ultimately proved to be a very successful policy that brought an end to the Cold War.</p>
<p dir="ltr">&#8220;If another country gets the idea that it can deal outside of official channels then that undermines presidential leadership,&#8221; he said.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="ltr">Dunn went on to say that Kennedy&#8217;s activities were a &#8220;clear violation of the U.S. Constitution and at the expense of presidential authority.&#8221;</p>
<p>Paul Kengor, author of <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0061136905?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=rongoodwyneco-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0061136905">The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism</a><img style="margin: 0px; border: medium none" height="1" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=rongoodwyneco-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=0061136905" width="1" border="0" /></em>, said &#8220;The pattern of behavior should concern members of both political parties, Kengor said, because it shows Kennedy was willing to work against American foreign policy, regardless of who occupied the White House.&#8221;</p>
<p>The question now is, will anyone in a position of authority take any action based on these revelations? Or is Kennedy, for all intents and purposes, bullet proof? With Democrats having gained control of both houses of Congress, I wouldn&#8217;t hold my breath. Of course, there is little reason to suspect Republicans would pursue this had they retained control because of the perceived political price it might cost them. Is it too much to ask that our elected leaders take justice and the law seriously? Is it to much to ask for those who work against this country&#8217;s best interest to pay for their illegal actions? Perhaps it is.</p>
<p><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&#038;url=www.ronsmusings.com%2f2006%2f11%2f12%2fted-kennedys-private-foreign-policy%2f&#038;title=Ted+Kennedy's+Private+Foreign+Policy&#038;bodytext=During+the+1980s%2c+Ted+Kennedy+undertook+his+own+private+foreign+policy+with+the+Soviet+Union.+Beginning+in+1980%2c+while+Carter+was+still+President+and+Kennedy+was+seeking+the+Democrat+nomination%2c+Kennedy+determined+that+%22the+Carter+administration+had+assumed+an+overly+belligerent+posture+toward+the+Soviet+Union+after+the+invasion+of+Afghanistan.%22+&#038;topic=political_opinion" target="_blank"><img height="17" alt="Digg!" src="http://digg.com/img/badges/91x17-digg-button.gif" width="91" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ronsmusings.com/2006/11/12/ted-kennedys-private-foreign-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
