<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ron&#039;s Musings &#187; Lindsey Graham</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ronsmusings.com/tag/lindsey-graham/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ronsmusings.com</link>
	<description>One man&#039;s reflections on walking with God</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:52:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Under the Bill</title>
		<link>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/06/26/under-the-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/06/26/under-the-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RINOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treason]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronsmusings.com/2007/06/26/under-the-bill/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I hear the phrase &#8220;under the bill&#8221; one more time regarding &#8220;comprehensive immigration reform&#8221; I think I will throw up. I was listening to Chertoff on Cavuto this afternoon and every time Cavuto brought up conservative objections, Chertoff&#8217;s response was &#8220;under the bill&#8230;&#8221; I&#8217;m convinced they are being intentionally obtuse. We&#8217;ve repeated over and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I hear the phrase &#8220;under the bill&#8221; one more time regarding &#8220;comprehensive immigration reform&#8221; I think I will throw up. I was listening to Chertoff on Cavuto this afternoon and every time Cavuto brought up conservative objections, Chertoff&#8217;s response was &#8220;under the bill&#8230;&#8221; I&#8217;m convinced they are being intentionally obtuse. We&#8217;ve repeated over and over that we don&#8217;t trust the government to do what the bill says.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been down this road before and all the evidence says the government isn&#8217;t serious about controlling the border or doing anything about illegals already here except to give them a pass. Of course, that just creates more incentive for more illegals to cross the boarder the government has shown no interest in securing. So why on earth should we trust them when they tell us that &#8220;under the bill&#8221; this and that will happen.</p>
<p>Chertoff, et. al. know this full well. Lindsey Graham knows this. All of them know this. We&#8217;ve said it ad nauseum! They simply choose to ignore what we say and go on calling us bigots and talking about what the bill will do. The fact is, current law calls for a fence that isn&#8217;t getting built. Current law calls for border enforcement. There is no need for another law to do these things. Yet Bush, Chertoff and the rest have no interest in enforcing current law. So WHY SHOULD WE TRUST THEM to enforce a new law? There is simply no reason to trust them.</p>
<p>A common definition for insanity is doing the same thing over and over, expecting a different result. The Bush administration and its lackeys in Congress apparently assume the electorate is insane. We should trust them to do the same thing they always done and expect them to actually enforce the law <em>this time</em>! I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>I like the idea I heard on the Laura Ingraham show today. Lets just start calling them former, as in former Senator Lindsey Graham and former Homeland Security Secretary Chertoff. I&#8217;ve already started working to unseat Lindsey Graham and there is a groundswell against him in South Carolina.</p>
<p>So if you are tempted to buy this line the &#8220;under the bill&#8221; they will secure the border and there will be a fence and there are triggers, don&#8217;t you believe it. They have to earn our trust. If your friend lies to you, you might give them another chance. But if they lie to you repeatedly, it takes a long, sustained effort of earning trust before you will be willing to trust them again. The same is true of our government. Let&#8217;s all assume the state motto of Oklahoma: Show Me! The only way they can show me is to start enforcing the law now and sustain that effort for an extended period of time. Then and only then, come back and maybe we&#8217;ll talk. But until they do that, there is absolutely no reason to trust them.</p>
<p class="zoundry_bw_tags">Â  <!-- Tag links generated by Zoundry Blog Writer. Do not manually edit. http://www.zoundry.com --></p>
<p>Â  <span class="ztags"></span><span class="ztagspace">Technorati</span> : <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/Amnesty" class="ztag">Amnesty</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/Border%20Security" class="ztag">Border Security</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/Illegal%20Aliens" class="ztag">Illegal Aliens</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/Immigration%20Reform" class="ztag">Immigration Reform</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/Lying%20Politicians" class="ztag">Lying Politicians</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/Politics" class="ztag">Politics</a><br />
<span class="ztags"></span><span class="ztagspace">Del.icio.us</span> : <a rel="tag" href="http://del.icio.us/tag/Amnesty" class="ztag">Amnesty</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://del.icio.us/tag/Border+Security" class="ztag">Border Security</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://del.icio.us/tag/Illegal+Aliens" class="ztag">Illegal Aliens</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://del.icio.us/tag/Immigration+Reform" class="ztag">Immigration Reform</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://del.icio.us/tag/Lying+Politicians" class="ztag">Lying Politicians</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://del.icio.us/tag/Politics" class="ztag">Politics</a><br />
<span class="ztags"></span><span class="ztagspace">Ice Rocket</span> : <a rel="tag" href="http://blogs.icerocket.com/tag/Amnesty" class="ztag">Amnesty</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://blogs.icerocket.com/tag/Border+Security" class="ztag">Border Security</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://blogs.icerocket.com/tag/Illegal+Aliens" class="ztag">Illegal Aliens</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://blogs.icerocket.com/tag/Immigration+Reform" class="ztag">Immigration Reform</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://blogs.icerocket.com/tag/Lying+Politicians" class="ztag">Lying Politicians</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://blogs.icerocket.com/tag/Politics" class="ztag">Politics</a><br />
<span class="ztags"></span><span class="ztagspace">Flickr</span> : <a rel="tag" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/Amnesty" class="ztag">Amnesty</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/Border+Security" class="ztag">Border Security</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/Illegal+Aliens" class="ztag">Illegal Aliens</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/Immigration+Reform" class="ztag">Immigration Reform</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/Lying+Politicians" class="ztag">Lying Politicians</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/Politics" class="ztag">Politics</a><br />
<span class="ztags"></span><span class="ztagspace">Zooomr</span> : <a rel="tag" href="http://beta.zooomr.com/photos/tags/Amnesty" class="ztag">Amnesty</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://beta.zooomr.com/photos/tags/Border%20Security" class="ztag">Border Security</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://beta.zooomr.com/photos/tags/Illegal%20Aliens" class="ztag">Illegal Aliens</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://beta.zooomr.com/photos/tags/Immigration%20Reform" class="ztag">Immigration Reform</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://beta.zooomr.com/photos/tags/Lying%20Politicians" class="ztag">Lying Politicians</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://beta.zooomr.com/photos/tags/Politics" class="ztag">Politics</a><br />
<span class="ztags"></span><span class="ztagspace">Buzznet</span> : <a rel="tag" href="http://www.buzznet.com/buzzwords/Amnesty" class="ztag">Amnesty</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.buzznet.com/buzzwords/Border%20Security" class="ztag">Border Security</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.buzznet.com/buzzwords/Illegal%20Aliens" class="ztag">Illegal Aliens</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.buzznet.com/buzzwords/Immigration%20Reform" class="ztag">Immigration Reform</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.buzznet.com/buzzwords/Lying%20Politicians" class="ztag">Lying Politicians</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.buzznet.com/buzzwords/Politics" class="ztag">Politics</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/06/26/under-the-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immigration Reform</title>
		<link>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/06/13/immigraiton-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/06/13/immigraiton-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 02:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RINOs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronsmusings.com/2007/06/13/immigraiton-reform/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the deal with immigration reform? If you have followed the debate and the actions in the Senate you may have wondered what is going on. Democrats clearly want immigration reform, yet Harry Reid pulled it from consideration after two unsuccessful attempts at cloture. He could have kept the debate going at least until [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the deal with immigration reform? If you have followed the debate and the actions in the Senate you may have wondered what is going on. Democrats clearly want immigration reform, yet Harry Reid pulled it from consideration after two unsuccessful attempts at cloture. He could have kept the debate going at least until President Bush returned but he chose to pull the legislation with Bush out of the country.</p>
<p>As for Republican backers on the Bush team like Lindsey Graham and John McCain, rather than attempt make well though out and reasoned arguments to the Republican base, they have called them bigots and xenophobes. That&#8217;s a sure way to sway the opposition in your own party.</p>
<p>So what is going on? Why are those who support comprehensive immigration reform doing almost the opposite of what they need to do to gain support?</p>
<p>Some are suggesting a grand conspiracy whereby the supporters of the package are actually trying to trick us. One person suggested that this was analogous to Bush nominating Harriet Meyers to the Supreme Court. His theory is that without the Meyers nomination, Alito could never have been confirmed. Others suggest that Democrats are simply trying to exhaust the American people so they can ultimately sneak this legislation through in the dark of night a few weeks from now.</p>
<p>Another suggestion, one that I think actually holds water, is that the Democrat leadership is more interested in denying Bush anything he could call a victory than they are in passing their most cherished legislation. In the eyes of Harry Reid, every initiative Bush is denied is another Senate seat come &#8216;08. Of course, if that is grand scheme, Ted Kennedy should get an Oscar nomination for his performance on the Senate floor when Reid pulled the package.</p>
<p>Now, of course, President Bush is committed to seeing this legislation come back up and it likely will. Tony Snow has become the point man for promoting the issue and he has taken a far different approach from Lindsey Graham, et. al. Snow appears to be listening to the opposition and answering their objections rather than calling them names.</p>
<p>Listening to Snow on various talk shows and news programs one is almost tempted to buy into this &#8220;reform&#8221; package. According to Snow the reforms are real, the triggers will be enforced. What Snow fails to address, and I&#8217;ve heard no one actually ask, is that every single illegal alien in this country <em>will receive immediate legal status</em> under this bill. That, by any definition, is amnesty.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a fan of Tony Snow. I&#8217;ve said before that it&#8217;s almost like having a friend in the White House. He is smart, articulate, reasoned and generally conservative. That&#8217;s why I can&#8217;t figure out what&#8217;s going on. I have a very difficult time believing Snow really thinks this is good legislation. True, he works for the President and is obligated to promote the President&#8217;s position. But if I was in Snow&#8217;s position I&#8217;d have no choice but to resign. I could not, in good conscience, argue in favor of this bill.</p>
<p>One thing I know. Unless Democrats are really committed to denying Bush any victory, this bill is going to keep coming back until it passes. That means it will require virtual permanent vigilance on the part of conservatives to keep it from passing.</p>
<p><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=www.ronsmusings.com%2f2007%2f06%2f13%2fimmigraiton-reform%2f&amp;title=Immigration+Reform&amp;bodytext=What+is+the+deal+with+immigration+reform%3f+If+you+have+followed+the+debate+and+the+actions+in+the+Senate+you+may+have+wondered+what+is+going+on.+Democrats+clearly+want+immigration+reform%2c+yet+Harry+Reid+pulled+it+from+consideration+after+two+unsuccessful+attempts+at+cloture.+He+could+have+kept+the+debate+going+at+least+until+President+Bush+returned+but+he+chose+to+pull+the+legislation+with+Bush+out+of+the+country.&amp;topic=political_opinion" target="_blank"><img width="91" alt="Digg!" height="17" src="http://digg.com/img/badges/91x17-digg-button.gif"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/06/13/immigraiton-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For President Bush, Loyalty is a One Way Street</title>
		<link>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/06/05/for-president-bush-loyalty-is-a-one-way-street/</link>
		<comments>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/06/05/for-president-bush-loyalty-is-a-one-way-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 02:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RINOs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronsmusings.com/2007/06/05/for-president-bush-loyalty-is-a-one-way-street/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there is one thing President Bush has placed a premium on it is loyalty. He expects those in his administration to be loyal to him. And he has expected the rank and file of the Republican Party to be loyal to him. The problem is, he doesn&#8217;t see the need to return that loyalty.
Conservatives [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is one thing President Bush has placed a premium on it is loyalty. He expects those in his administration to be loyal to him. And he has expected the rank and file of the Republican Party to be loyal to him. The problem is, he doesn&#8217;t see the need to return that loyalty.</p>
<p>Conservatives like me have stood by the President in spite of some pretty awful stuff. Take No Child Left Behind or his signing of Campaign Finance Reform or the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit. In spite of these many things that were hardly conservative, we&#8217;ve stood by our President.</p>
<p>Now, when both Republicans and Democrats have a big problem with Comprehensive Immigration Reform, is the President willing to be loyal to those who have consistently supported him? Not on your life. He doesn&#8217;t even allow that our&#8217;s could be principled opposition. Instead, the President, McCain, Graham, et.al., characterize us as xenophobes and bigots.</p>
<p>I scratch my head every day wondering why the President and others in the Republican Party are so determined to jam this through no matter how much opposition there is. I can understand that the Republican Party does not want to be seen as anti-Hispanic. But in the end the President and his cadre are doing two things that are extremely harmful to the future prospects of the party.</p>
<p>First, they are jamming a wedge into the party. Some have characterized it as tearing the party apart and that may be an accurate description. There is a war within the Republican Party today and it is being waged primarily by President Bush and his accomplices. They are at war with the rank and file of the party and that does not bode well the Republican prospects in &#8216;08.</p>
<p>Second, it is virtually indisputable that the vast majority of current illegals that ultimately become voting citizens will be Democrat voters. Clearly Ted Kennedy and the Democrat Party understand this. That&#8217;s why they&#8217;re willing to stand up to the unions on this issue. It takes something that big for the Democrat Party to stand up to unions.</p>
<p>The bottom line is, Republicans are screwed for a generation or more if this travesty of a piece of legislation makes it into law. Why then is the President doing it? Why is he willing to demagogue this issue? Why does he feel justified in calling those of us who oppose this xenophobes and bigots when he knows full well that isn&#8217;t true?</p>
<p>The only thing I can figure is the President is working on his legacy. He is as much a lame duck President as any ever was. His popularity is in the tank and it&#8217;s likely to go lower still with no rebound in sight unless there is a dramatic turnaround in Iraq. But if he can ram this down our throats he will be the President that dealt with the immigration problem. That&#8217;s what he&#8217;s counting on. The President wants his legacy and he&#8217;s willing to sell us out to get it! To hell with loyalty to the party or his supporters at the polls. His legacy takes precedence over loyalty. So tell me, why should anyone hold any loyalty to him?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never believed that Bush was a conservative. During his 2000 run I was not impressed and did not voter for him in the primary. But he got the nomination and I voted for him in the general election. Again in 2004 I voted for him just like millions of conservatives all across America who held their noses and checked off his name. We got some good for it. We got some good justices on the Supreme Court and we got tax cuts. But there is little else to show for our support.</p>
<p>I am finished being loyal to President Bush or any other Republican who puts his own interests ahead of his constituents. Lindsey Graham certainly falls into that category. Let this be a warning to Republican officials and candidates. We conservatives are not willing to be your lapdogs any longer. If you think I&#8217;m some lone malcontent, think again. There are many more just like me who will not continue to vote for you if you are unwilling to take a stand for conservative principles. We want to see a victory in &#8216;08. We don&#8217;t want to see Hilary in the White House. But we will not be lemmings. If you expect loyalty from us you&#8217;d better be prepared to be loyal to us!</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=www.ronsmusings.com%2f2007%2f06%2f05%2ffor-president-bush-loyalty-is-a-one-way-street%2f&amp;title=For+President+Bush%2c+Loyalty+is+a+One+Way+Street&amp;bodytext=If+there+is+one+thing+President+Bush+has+placed+a+premium+on+it+is+loyalty.++He+expects+those+in+his+administration+to+be+loyal+to+him.++And+he+has+expected+the+rank+and+file+of+the+Republican+Party+to+be+loyal+to+him.++The+problem+is%2c+he+doesn't+see+the+need+to+return+that+loyalty.&amp;topic=political_opinion"><img width="91" src="http://digg.com/img/badges/91x17-digg-button.gif" alt="Digg!" height="17" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/06/05/for-president-bush-loyalty-is-a-one-way-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defeat Lindsey Graham Blog</title>
		<link>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/05/25/defeat-lindsey-graham-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/05/25/defeat-lindsey-graham-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 14:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronsmusings.com/2007/05/25/defeat-lindsey-graham-blog/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All the focus these days if the &#8216;08 presidential election. But let&#8217;s not forget that there are a lot of other politicians who will be up for reelection in November &#8216;08 as well. One of those will be South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham. Regular readers know I am dedicated to seeing Graham defeated in &#8216;08. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the focus these days if the &#8216;08 presidential election. But let&#8217;s not forget that there are a lot of other politicians who will be up for reelection in November &#8216;08 as well. One of those will be South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham. Regular readers know I am dedicated to seeing Graham defeated in &#8216;08. To that end I have begun a new blog, <a href="http://www.lindseygraham.info/" target="_blank">Defeat Lindsey Graham</a>. I&#8217;m looking for others who would like to see Graham defeated. I need researchers, writers, contributors, etc. Pretty much anyone who wants to see Graham go down. This man does not deserve another term in the Senate or even as dog catcher. He is a disgrace to the party and the state of South Carolina. So go on over to <a href="http://www.lindseygraham.info">www.lindseygraham.info</a> and sign up to be a part of this.</p>
<p><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=www.ronsmusings.com%2f2007%2f05%2f25%2fdefeat-lindsey-graham-blog%2f&amp;title=Defeat+Lindsey+Graham+Blog&amp;bodytext=All+the+focus+these+days+if+the+'08+presidential+election.++But+let's+not+forget+that+there+are+a+lot+of+other+politicians+who+will+be+up+for+reelection+in+November+'08+as+well.++One+of+those+will+be+South+Carolina+Senator+Lindsey+Graham.++Regular+readers+know+I+am+dedicated+to+seeing+Graham+defeated+in+'08.&amp;topic=political_opinion" target="_blank"><img width="91" alt="Digg!" height="17" src="http://digg.com/img/badges/91x17-digg-button.gif"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/05/25/defeat-lindsey-graham-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bipartisan BS</title>
		<link>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/05/22/bipartisan-bs/</link>
		<comments>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/05/22/bipartisan-bs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 20:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RINOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treason]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronsmusings.com/2007/05/22/bipartisan-bs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#8217;t begin to describe my emotions upon hearing the collective stream of BS coming from the Senate Floor. Senator after Senator took the floor to describe their wonderful immigrant ancestors. The message was clear. All of us who oppose the rising tide of illegal immigrants remaining here legally are actually opposed to ALL immigration. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t begin to describe my emotions upon hearing the collective stream of BS coming from the Senate Floor. Senator after Senator took the floor to describe their wonderful immigrant ancestors. The message was clear. All of us who oppose the rising tide of illegal immigrants remaining here legally are actually opposed to ALL immigration. We don&#8217;t understand what this country was built on. We are bigots and xenophobes.</p>
<p>Listening to Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter tell about his father and brother immigrating here was just wonderful. What an inspiring story. But what on Earth does it have to do with the situation at hand? Specter&#8217;s father and brother immigrated here legally. They came here, submitted to processing, filled out the paperwork and followed our immigration laws. They learned English and worked to assimilate into American society.</p>
<p>South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham did precisely the same thing last week. The video is below in this blog. He talked about a Hispanic guy in the Air Force that was an inspiration to him. Great! No problem! Does anyone believe that Hispanic man in the Air Force was an illegal alien? Did he sneak across our border and join the Air Force? Of course not. If he was an immigrant at all he was a legal immigrant.</p>
<p>This in contrast to the ever growing flood of illegal aliens crossing our borders. They are not interested in becoming Americans. They have no desire to learn English or assimilate into American society. Mostly they want to take advantage of the services offered here and send money back to their home countries. Did you know that one of the biggest aspects of the Mexican economy is money sent home from America? That&#8217;s certainly one reason the Mexican government has been so opposed to any effort on our part to do something about the border.</p>
<p>The Congress can&#8217;t seem to understand why the American public doesn&#8217;t trust them on this. Could it be that we have been here before? We were told we&#8217;d have border security with the immigration reform in the &#8217;80s. Did we get it? Does 12-20 million illegal aliens in this country look like we got it?</p>
<p>Now, rather than engage in an honest debate, they prefer to lie about those of us who oppose this measure. They say we are bigots and xenophobes. They do not acknowledge that there is a difference between illegal and legal immigration. In short, they lie to support their position and, apparently, they believe that if they lie long enough we will buy the lie. Small wonder we don&#8217;t trust Congress!</p>
<p>If you guys in the Congress want to gain some credibility, stop trying to shove this sham of a bill down our throats and instead, ENFORCE OUR CURRENT LAWS!! If you do that consistently for a period of time, you might just build up a little credibility. But so long as you insist on playing politics with the American people, so long as they continue to lie and mischaracterize those of us who oppose their position, they have no credibility.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t hold your breath waiting for them to change though. Graham, Specter, McCain and all the rest of the Republicans pushing so hard on this issue are not concerned with what we, the people they represent, think. They somehow think that doing this will enhance their future electability. As for Graham, I think he&#8217;s angling for the VP spot with McCain. The problem for Graham is, McCain doesn&#8217;t stand a chance of getting the nomination and Graham doesn&#8217;t stand a chance of keeping his Senate seat in &#8216;08. His political career as a Republican is all but over. He is already a lame duck and he is blind to the fact.</p>
<p>I can think of no better reason for resurrecting the issue of term limits. Career politicians are the biggest problem in this country. They are far less concerned with what is actually best for this country than they are about the next election. So long as power is the motivating factor, do not expect most of our elected officials to actually honor their promises and act in an ethical, principled manner.</p>
<p>I was on the phone with my father in Georgia last night. He&#8217;s been a big supporter of Georgia Senator Saxby Chambliss. But Chambliss is one of those Republicans working so hard to sell out this country. My dad can&#8217;t believe it! I don&#8217;t know what all the backroom deals have been. I know President Bush is looking for a legacy in a lame duck presidency and who can imagine what he has promised to Republicans who toe the line on this.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I do know. If Republicans allow this legislation to become law, the Republican party is finished for the foreseeable future. All of Harry Reid&#8217;s predictions of massive Democrat Gains in the Senate will come to pass. Nancy Pelosi will be Speaker of the House for the next ten years at least. Maybe a solid conservative like Fred Thompson will be able to pull out the White House, I don&#8217;t know. But I&#8217;d lay odds that we will again be saying President Clinton and that is a future I don&#8217;t relish.</p>
<p>Finally, if this legislation becomes law, the Democrat party will be the ultimate winner. The vast majority of the illegal aliens in this country are already indebted to Democrats for the services they currently receive. The Democrats will continue with their vote buying legislative agenda. It could be a generation or more before the Republican party can recover, if them. Why congressional Republicans can&#8217;t see that simple fact is quite beyond me.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=www.ronsmusings.com%2f2007%2f05%2f22%2fbipartisan-bs%2f&amp;title=Bipartisan+BS&amp;bodytext=I+can't+begin+to+describe+my+emotions+upon+hearing+the+collective+stream+of+BS+coming+from+the+Senate+Floor.++Senator+after+Senator+took+the+floor+to+describe+their+wonderful+immigrant+ancestors.++The+message+was+clear.++All+of+us+who+oppose+the+rising+tide+of+illegal+immigrants+remaining+here+legally+are+actually+opposed+to+ALL+immigration.++We+don't+understand+what+this+country+was+built+on.++We+are+bigots+and+xenophobes.&amp;topic=political_opinion"><img width="91" src="http://digg.com/img/badges/91x17-digg-button.gif" alt="Digg!" height="17" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/05/22/bipartisan-bs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amnesty by Any Other Name Still Screws America</title>
		<link>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/05/18/amnesty-by-any-other-name-screws-america/</link>
		<comments>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/05/18/amnesty-by-any-other-name-screws-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 15:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RINOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treason]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronsmusings.com/2007/05/18/amnesty-by-any-other-name-screws-america/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
President Bush, along with RINOs Lindsey Graham and John McCain and Democrat Ted Kennedy, have reached a &#8220;compromise&#8221; for comprehensive immigration reform. That phrase, &#8220;comprehensive immigration reform&#8221; is code for amnesty. President Bush announced that the plan does not grant amnesty but any bill that allows aliens currently in this country illegally to pay a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa180/goodwyne/facing_up_to_illegal_immigration.jpg" style="DISPLAY: inline; FLOAT: right; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; WIDTH: 512px; HEIGHT: 409px" height="409" width="512" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket" border="0"/></a></p>
<p>President Bush, along with RINOs Lindsey Graham and John McCain and Democrat Ted Kennedy, have reached a &#8220;compromise&#8221; for comprehensive immigration reform. That phrase, &#8220;comprehensive immigration reform&#8221; is code for amnesty. President Bush announced that the plan does not grant amnesty but any bill that allows aliens currently in this country illegally to pay a fine and get on a &#8220;path to citizenship&#8221; or permanent residency is an amnesty bill.</p>
<p>Virtually no one likes this bill. Backers are reluctant to discuss specifics beyond saying illegals will have to pay a fine and return home for a period of time. It is unlikely that the return home will be enforced or, if enforced, that illegals will have to stay for any significant period of time. How do you track more the more than 12 million people? Maybe set up another inefficient federal agency? And a $5,000 fine is a price many around the world would gladly pay for legal entrance into the united states. Yet those who have not entered this country illegally don&#8217;t get any special treatment and path toward citizenship.</p>
<p>Additionally, the Z visa only requires the head of household to return to the home country. His family can stay and there is no real idea of just how long he might have to stay in his home country but one official said it could be as short as one day. Convince me that won&#8217;t encourage more illegal immigration! Only a fool could believe that tail.</p>
<p>While this compromise seems historic, it appears there is still an uphill battle. Both conservatives and liberals have problems with it. Conservatives, of course, oppose the amnesty aspect of the proposal. Liberals oppose the change in immigration standards away from uniting families and toward more emphasis on skills.</p>
<p>Still, there is great interest on both sides of the aisle for passing some kind of comprehensive immigration reform this year. With that attitude, it is all but certain that, without outside effort, this will become a reality in some form before it&#8217;s all over. Conservatives must stay in touch with their Senators and Congressmen and keep the pressure on. This must be stopped. Amnesty did not work 20 some odd years ago and it won&#8217;t work today.</p>
<p>For my money, the way to deal with illegals currently in this country is to make it so painful for companies to employee them that simply won&#8217;t take the risk. When illegals find they cannot find work and support their families, much less send money back home, they will go home voluntarily. If there is not reason to be here, why would the stay? The incentives to come here illegally must be removed. That, along with real border enforcement will solve our problem. Then and only then we can look at a guest worker program and at that point, those who can speak English will have an advantage, regardless of whether they were previously here illegally</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Fred Thompson said that the bill and the attempt to create any comprehensive immigration reform should be scrapped until the border is secured. YEAH! That&#8217;s a position I can really get behind.</p>
<p><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=www.ronsmusings.com%2f2007%2f05%2f18%2famnesty-by-any-other-name-screws-america%2f&amp;title=Amnesty+by+Any+Other+Name+Still+Screws+America&amp;bodytext=President+Bush%2c+along+with+RINOs+Lindsey+Graham+and+John+McCain+and+Democrat+Ted+Kennedy%2c+have+reached+a+%22compromise%22+for+comprehensive+immigration+reform.++That+phrase%2c+%22comprehensive+immigration+reform%22+is+code+for+amnesty.++President+Bush+announced+that+the+plan+does+not+grant+amnesty+but+any+bill+that+allows+aliens+currently+in+this+country+illegally+to+pay+a+fine+and+get+on+a+%22path+to+citizenship%22++or+permanent+residency+is+an+amnesty+bill.&amp;topic=political_opinion" target="_blank"><img width="91" alt="Digg!" height="17" src="http://digg.com/img/badges/91x17-digg-button.gif"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/05/18/amnesty-by-any-other-name-screws-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Border Security Supported by Bigots</title>
		<link>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/05/10/border-security-supported-by-bigots/</link>
		<comments>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/05/10/border-security-supported-by-bigots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 18:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronsmusings.com/2007/05/10/border-security-supported-by-bigots/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a while since I posted about Lindsey Graham, though you may notice the Lindsey Graham Watch link above. Long time readers know that I am no fan of Senator Graham. I worked for his election and I have been disappointed over and over ever since. Now there&#8217;s another idiotic statement coming from this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a while since I posted about Lindsey Graham, though you may notice the Lindsey Graham Watch <a href="http://www.ronsmusings.com/lindsey-graham-watch/" target="_blank">link</a> above. Long time readers know that I am no fan of Senator Graham. I worked for his election and I have been disappointed over and over ever since. Now there&#8217;s another idiotic statement coming from this glory hound&#8217;s mouth. Watch this YouTube video.</p>
<p><a href="http://ronsmusings.com/2007/05/10/border-security-supported-by-bigots/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>So Graham believes that those of us who oppose illegal immigration are bigots? While I&#8217;m sure there are those who simply do not like Hispanics, the vast majority of American&#8217;s who oppose illegal immigration do so not on the basis of race; they oppose it on the basis of American sovereignty. They do so on the basis of national security. They do so because illegal aliens are decimating our country.</p>
<p>It has nothing to do with race. I personally welcome immigrants from most anywhere who enter this country legally and follow the prescribed path to obtaining US citizenship. I have no problem with that. What I have a problem with is 12-20 million people who come here illegally and continue to break our laws. I&#8217;d oppose that no matter what race those people are.</p>
<p>Senator Graham understands all this. He knows full well that we are not racists or bigots. He is simply demagoguing this issue in order to shut us up or marginalize us. Well it won&#8217;t work Senator Graham. We will not be silenced. We will not shut up. And I promise that you will have your work cut out for you if you think you will retain your seat in the Senate after the &#8216;08 election. I and others like me will work tirelessly to defeat you because you have no interest in what&#8217;s right for America. You are only interested in promoting yourself at the expense of America.</p>
<p>Name for me one other junior Senator with less than one term under his belt who gets 50% of the face time that Senator Graham gets. It is not simply coincidence and it certainly isn&#8217;t that he&#8217;s so smart and appealing. It is only because Senator Graham does whatever it takes to get attention. As the saying goes, if his grandmother gets between him and a TV camera, she better be darned quick because he will surely knock her to the ground running for that camera.</p>
<p>Hat Tip ALa at <a href="http://mobyrebuttal.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Blonde Sagacity</a></p>
<p><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=www.ronsmusings.com%2f2007%2f05%2f10%2fborder-security-supported-by-bigots%2f&amp;title=Border+Security+Supported+by+Bigots&amp;bodytext=Long+time+readers+know+that+I+am+no+fan+of+Senator+Graham.++I+worked+for+his+election+and+I+have+been+disappointed+over+and+over+ever+since.++Now+there's+another+idiotic+statement+coming+from+this+glory+hound's+mouth.++Watch+this+YouTube+video.&amp;topic=political_opinion" target="_blank"><img width="91" alt="Digg!" height="17" src="http://digg.com/img/badges/91x17-digg-button.gif"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/05/10/border-security-supported-by-bigots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lindsey Graham Supports John McCain</title>
		<link>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/03/19/lindsey-graham-supports-john-mccain/</link>
		<comments>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/03/19/lindsey-graham-supports-john-mccain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronsmusings.com/2007/03/19/lindsey-graham-supports-john-mccain/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regular readers of this blog know that I am committed to the defeat of Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. After working for his election in 2000, I have been repeatedly disappointed in Graham. He campaigned as a conservative but he has shown himself to be anything but. I&#8217;ve come to believe that he has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regular readers of this blog know that I am committed to the defeat of Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. After working for his election in 2000, I have been repeatedly disappointed in Graham. He campaigned as a conservative but he has shown himself to be anything but. I&#8217;ve come to believe that he has no core convictions. He does what he thinks will move him closer to running for president.</p>
<p>Now Graham is supporting John McCain. As if I needed further proof that Graham is no conservative. Today I received the following email from the McCain campaign.</p>
<blockquote style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir="ltr">
<p>Dear Friend:</p>
<p>As you evaluate the various candidates for President of the United States, the interview (right) contains facts and insights we all need to know about John McCain.</p>
<p>Conducted just a few days ago, this brief, very candid interview truly is amazing. In just a few short minutes, you will get an unforgettable insight into this unique man. The words are softly spoken but the emotional impact is profound.</p>
<p>The three of us felt so strongly you should see this that we decided to co-sign this personal message. Please take a few moments to view this powerful clip. And you will probably want to share it with your friends. Thank you.</p>
<p>U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham<br />S.C. Speaker of the House Bobby Harrell<br />S.C. Attorney General Henry McMaster</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="ltr">The interview refereed to was a televised interview with John McCain. With the Republican field of candidates as poor as it is, McCain is convincing people that he is actually a conservative and he&#8217;s using people like Graham to do it. If we don&#8217;t see some real conservatives enter this campaign soon, we run the real risk that McCain will be the nominee.</p>
<p dir="ltr">I once believed that McCain could never get the nominations. My belief was predicated on the notion that there would be actual conservatives running. To date there are no conservatives in the race with the national name recognition and clean record who are capable of winning anything.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Folks, the Republican party is in trouble. Worse, conservatives are in trouble and that means this country is in trouble.</p>
<p><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=www.ronsmusings.com%2f2007%2f03%2f19%2flindsey-graham-supports-john-mccain%2f&amp;title=Lindsey+Graham+Supports+John+McCain&amp;bodytext=Regular+readers+of+this+blog+know+that+I+am+committed+to+the+defeat+of+Senator+Lindsey+Graham+of+South+Carolina.+After+working+for+his+election+in+2000%2c+I+have+been+repeatedly+disappointed+in+Graham.+He+campaigned+as+a+conservative+but+he+has+shown+himself+to+be+anything+but.+I've+come+to+believe+that+he+has+no+core+convictions.+He+does+what+he+thinks+will+move+him+closer+to+running+for+president.+&amp;topic=political_opinion" target="_blank"><img width="91" alt="Digg!" height="17" src="http://digg.com/img/badges/91x17-digg-button.gif"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/03/19/lindsey-graham-supports-john-mccain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative John McCain?</title>
		<link>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/03/03/conservative-john-mccain/</link>
		<comments>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/03/03/conservative-john-mccain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 20:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patriot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronsmusings.com/2007/03/03/conservative-john-mccain/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a little while since I wrote a purely political post and now it is time. I received an email today from Bobby Harrell, Speaker of the House in the South Carolina Legislature. He was enthusiastic over John McCain&#8217;s win in the Spartanburg straw poll on Thursday. It seems that as of Thursday even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a little while since I wrote a purely political post and now it is time. I received an email today from Bobby Harrell, Speaker of the House in the South Carolina Legislature. He was enthusiastic over John McCain&#8217;s win in the Spartanburg straw poll on Thursday. It seems that as of Thursday even McCain was a distant third but by the time all the votes had been counted Friday morning, McCain had won by two points.</p>
<p>Speaker Harrell goes on to promote McCain as a conservative. My question is, what is Speaker Harrell&#8217;s definition of conservative?</p>
<p>It seems that the term conservative, much like many other terms in our day, has undergone a redefinition. Apparently it no longer means committed to limited government. It no longer means being dedicated to the Constitution of the United States, as written. If John McCain can be considered a conservative then the very word conservative has lost its meaning altogether.</p>
<p>You will remember that McCain, in his misguided attempts to blame his own shortcomings on others, managed to bulldoze through McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform. That legislation represents the single biggest assault on constitutionally protected political speech in my lifetime, perhaps ever! But Senator McCain was convinced that we needed it. In fact, he is not satisfied to stop there and now wants to go after the 521s that resulted from his previous legislation.</p>
<p>What McCain has done is make it more difficult for anyone to challenge incumbents while severely limiting the ability of individuals to make their voices heard when it comes to politics. If the First Amendment&#8217;s free speech clause protects anything, it protects political speech in all forms but John McCain, apparently, disagrees or doesn&#8217;t care. His view of things takes precedence over the Constitution it seems.</p>
<p>John McCain, who has worked hard to build his reputation as a maverick, is anything but a conservative. He is an opportunist. He wants to be President and has done everything in his power to keep his face in the news to that end. His protege, Lindsey Graham, is following close in his footsteps. Neither is a conservative and neither will ever have my support.</p>
<p>I still subscribe to a more traditional definition of conservative. I believe in limited government and individual responsibility to go along with individual rights. I believe, as did most of our founding fathers, that a religious electorate is necessary to a republican for of government. I believe that political speech is protected by the first amendment but pornography is not. Call me old fashioned but that is how I view conservatism. John McCain has a different view. He opposed the tax cuts that he now thinks should be extended but he will not say that he was wrong in opposing them in the first place. He supports the troop surge but it that appears to be political expediency. While his position cost him support initially, he has clearly gain conservative support as a result. He is attempting to remake himself in a conservative mold. He has rightly judged what most in the Republican party have missed. That is, that conservatives have had it with Republicans who abandon conservative principles. Had John McCain stood for these things all along he would have me in his camp. But not only has he NOT stood for these things, he will not repudiate his prior positions.</p>
<p>John McCain does not meet my definition of a conservative. He never has and I expect he never will. I still do not believe he can get the Republican nomination but if I am proved wrong, I will have to do a lot of soul searching before I could vote for him. His motivation is his personal aspirations. He is not motivated by principles and I cannot support anyone who votes for or opposes anything based on how it will reflect on him personally.</p>
<p><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=www.ronsmusings.com%2f2007%2f03%2f03%2fconservative-john-mccain%2f&amp;title=Conservative+John+McCain%3f&amp;bodytext=John+McCain%2c+who+has+worked+hard+to+build+his+reputation+as+a+maverick%2c+is+anything+but+a+conservative.+He+is+an+opportunist.+He+wants+to+be+President+and+has+done+everything+in+his+power+to+keep+his+face+in+the+news+to+that+end.+His+protege%2c+Lindsey+Graham%2c+is+following+close+in+his+footsteps.+Neither+is+a+conservative+and+neither+will+ever+have+my+support.&amp;topic=political_opinion" target="_blank"><img width="91" alt="Digg!" height="17" src="http://digg.com/img/badges/91x17-digg-button.gif"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ronsmusings.com/2007/03/03/conservative-john-mccain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lindsey Graham is Toast in 2008</title>
		<link>http://ronsmusings.com/2006/09/14/lindsey-graham-is-toast-in-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://ronsmusings.com/2006/09/14/lindsey-graham-is-toast-in-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RINOs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronsmusings.com/2006/09/14/lindsey-graham-is-toast-in-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I live in South Carolina and four years ago I was an active campaigner for Lindsey Graham. I made phone calls, walked precincts, went to campaign events, put out campaign signs and generally spent my spare time working to elect Lindsey Graham.
There are few things in my life that I regret more.
Lindsey Graham has been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in South Carolina and four years ago I was an active campaigner for Lindsey Graham. I made phone calls, walked precincts, went to campaign events, put out campaign signs and generally spent my spare time working to elect Lindsey Graham.</p>
<p>There are few things in my life that I regret more.</p>
<p>Lindsey Graham has been characterized by some as courageous because of his willingness to go against his party. I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s courageous. I think Graham has his eyes on the White House and everything he does is entirely self serving. He&#8217;s been a Senator less than one term and he has more face time than almost anyone in the Senate. That is no coincidence.</p>
<p>Once again Graham has put his political aspirations ahead of party and country. He&#8217;s again partnered with RINO John McCain to thwart the president&#8217;s plan to clarify article III of the Geneva Convention so that our troops and the CIA can know what is acceptable and what is not when it comes to interrogating enemy prisoners. Graham&#8217;s actions follow his participation in the gang of 14 when he helped thwart Bush&#8217;s conservative nominations to the federal bench.</p>
<p>When Graham first ran for the Senate in 2002 he ran as a conservative. He has proven himself to be anything but a conservative. I&#8217;m not sure Graham has any core convictions. He stands for what he thinks will get his face before the public and get him the most publicity. He knows that anyone running for President needs name recognition and few politicians in Washington have greater name recognition that does Graham. Strange that that should be as such a junior member of the Senate.</p>
<p>There is one thing you can be certain of. When the 2008 campaign rolls around I will work tirelessly to defeat Graham. I will volunteer my time for the most conservative candidate in the primaries and I&#8217;ll go door to door telling everyone who will listen why Graham isn&#8217;t worthy of their vote. Should he win the nomination anyway, or should he be unopposed, I will work for whom ever his opponent is, even a Democrat. I&#8217;d rather have a Democrat representing this state than a snake in the grass RINO out to serve no one but himself.</p>
<p>Lindsey Graham has got to go and I will do everything in my power to ensure he is a one term Senator. He is an embarrassment to the State of South Carolina and to this country.</p>
<p><em><strong>UPDATE:</strong></em></p>
<p><a href="http://powerlineblog.com/archives/015275.php" target="_blank">Powerline Blog</a> notes that Graham was interviewd by Hugh Hewitt where he promised to vote to allow judicial nominee William Haynes, General Counsel of the Department of Defense, to be released to the Senate floor for a full vote up or down.  Graham said, however, that he would vote against Haynes on the Senate floor.  Says Powerline:</p>
<blockquote><p>So, if Graham can be trusted, I think that means that after a delay of several years, Haynes&#8217;s nomination will finally receive a Senate vote. That&#8217;s a victory of sorts, I guess.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sounds to me like the folks at Powerline don&#8217;t trust Graham any more than I do!</p>
<p>Watch for a new section on this blog in the near furture dedicated to informing you about just what Lindsey Graham is doing why he should be defeated.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Conservative" rel="tag">Conservative</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Lindsey+Graham" rel="tag">Lindsey Graham</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Politician" rel="tag">Politician</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Politics" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Republicans" rel="tag">Republicans</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/RINO" rel="tag">RINO</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Snake" rel="tag">Snake</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Traitor" rel="tag">Traitor</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ronsmusings.com/2006/09/14/lindsey-graham-is-toast-in-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
